The antecedents of trust: PSY 655 Week 2 Assignment



The antecedents of trust: PSY 655 Week 2 Assignment
The antecedents of trust: PSY 655 Week 2 Assignment

Details:

Write a 1,000-1,250-word essay addressing the following question:

The antecedents of trust (ability, benevolence, and integrity) proposed in the assigned article, “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” are defined rather simply. Using additional research on trust and leader behavior, identify how you could coach a person to engage in behaviors that might elicit higher levels of those antecedents in followers.
Describe how the strategies might change depending on what setting the leader might be in. (Business, industrial, etc.)
Use the GCU eLibrary databases, and assigned readings; include a minimum of three scholarly resources for evidentiary support.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER
PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 2 Discussion 1 Latest November 2016

Discuss how the definition of trust from page 712 of the assigned article, “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” relates to a leader’s role in the lives of followers?

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 2 Discussion 2 Latest November 2016

Why do coworkers place more trust in coworkers trusted by leaders? How is this important to our understanding of workplace behavior and leadership?

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 7 Discussion 1 Latest November 2016

There are five identified steps to the CIT method as mentioned in the “Using the Critical Incident Technique in Counselling Psychology Research” article. Clearly all five are important. Please choose the one you believe to be most critical. Describe it and then discuss why you believe it is the most critical step.

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 7 Discussion 2 Latest November 2016

Choose one of the evolutions of CIT and discuss how it may have made the application of CIT to specific leadership consultations more useful.

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 7 Assignment Latest November 2016

Details:

This CIT Interview Techniques assignment includes two parts: a critical incident interview (due in Module 7), and a summary report (due in Module 8).

To frame the context for this assignment, consider the following statement as the basis of the project: “There is evidence that researchers using the CIT are now asking participants to reflect upon and write down the meaning of critical incidents, not just discuss them in a research interview” (From the Canadian Journal of Counselling, by Butterfield et al., 2005, p. 489).

Interview Preliminaries:

Using methodology described in the readings, prepare a list of questions regarding an individual’s direct personal experience with leaders. A minimum of 15 questions is required.
As the interviewer, pose the questions to the respondent(s). Questions include but are not limited to specific leadership moments, negative and/or positive experiences, leader decisions and consequences, or any direction drawn from course readings to this point.
Identify a subgroup of people in your immediate circle of contact with whom you have the ability to conduct a critical incident technique (CIT) interview regarding their experience with leaders in their own lives.
Conduct a minimum of three interviews.
Prepare this assignment as a Word document according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.


Scroll to Top