Rubric Title: Unit 2, 4, 6 Lab – Virtual Reality Rubric



Purdue University Global logo

Rubric Title: Unit 2, 4, 6 Lab – Virtual Reality Rubric

***Students: It is IMPORTANT to remember to utilize both the “Guided Mode” and “Expert Mode” in the VR Lab Simulation case scenario experiences, as you practice the VR Lab scenario(s). The “Guided Mode” and “Expert Mode” allow you to have multiple tries/attempts to practice the case. THEN, when you feel you are ready, you will choose the VR Lab “Exam Mode” (that you can ONLY attempt once); the score you receive in “Exam Mode” will then be your final grade in the VR Lab. If you have any questions regarding this, please follow up with your course instructor.

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III

Points: 80

Level II

Points: 64

Level I

Points: 48

Not Present

0 Points

Total Score

· Within Exam Mode, obtains 65 to 80 points of the required total components for virtual reality patient scenario

· Within Exam Mode, obtains between 49 to 64.9 points of the required total components for virtual reality patient scenario

· Within Exam Mode, obtains between 33 to 48.9 points of the required total components for virtual reality patient scenario

· Does not attempt in Exam Mode

· Does not meet the criteria

Rubric Title: Unit 3, 5, 7 SOAP Journal Assignment Rubric

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 8

Level II Max Points

Points: 6.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.8

0 Points

Content Quality- Subjective Data

Subjective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of virtual reality patient case including:

· Name, age, gender

· Chief complaint

· History of present illness (HPI) that follows OLD CARTS pneumonic

· Medications

· Allergies

· Past medical history

· Past surgical history

· Pertinent family history

· Social history

· Review of Systems

· Subjective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Subjective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 8

Level II Max Points

Points: 6.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality- Objective Data

Objective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Vital signs

· Body systems that are pertinent to specific case

· Objective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Objective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details

· Does not meet criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 4

Level II Max Points

Points: 3.2

Level I Max Points

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality- Assessment

Assessment displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Primary diagnosis

· Pathophysiology of primary diagnosis

· Three differential diagnoses

· Rationales for differential diagnoses

· Assessment displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1 critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Assessment displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max Points

Points: 4

Level II Max Points

Points: 3.2

Level I Max Points

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality- Plan of Care

Plan displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Medications

· Non-pharmacological recommendations

· Diagnostic tests

· Patient education

· Cultural considerations

· Health promotion

· Referrals

· Follow-Up

· Plan displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1 critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Plan displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max Points

Points: 3

Level II Max Points

Points: 2.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 1.8

Not Present

0 Points

Collegiate-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information.

· Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information.

· Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability.

· Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information.

· Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source.

· Reference sources are within the past five years.

· Does not meet criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max Points

Points: 3

Level II Max Points

Points: 2.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 1.8

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

● The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment. There may be 1-2 sentences, or one paragraph that is out of order, or other minor organization issues.

● Correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

● Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.

● The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences, or two paragraphs that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

● Correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

● Quotation marks and citations generally, make authorship clear.

● The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three paragraphs that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

● Attempts to cite. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

● Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect.

● Authorship may be unclear in areas.

· Does not meet criteria

Maximum Total Points

30

24

18

Minimum Total Points

25

19

Rubric Title: Unit 8 Journal Rubric

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 15

Level II Max Points

Points: 12

Level I Max Points

Points:9

0 Points

Content Quality- Subjective Data

Presentation of subjective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Name, age, gender

· Chief complaint

· History of present illness (HPI) that follows OLD CARTS pneumonic

· Medications

· Allergies

· Past medical history

· Past surgical history

· Pertinent family history

· Social history

· Review of Systems

· Presentation of subjective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of subjective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 15

Level II Max Points

Points: 12

Level I Max Points

Points:9

0 Points

Content Quality- Objective Data

Presentation of objective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Vital signs

· Body systems that are pertinent to specific case

· Presentation of objective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of objective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 15

Level II Max Points

Points: 12

Level I Max Points

Points:9

0 Points

Content Quality- Assessment

Presentation of assessment displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Primary diagnosis

· Pathophysiology of primary diagnosis

· Three differential diagnoses

· Rationales for differential diagnoses

· Presentation of assessment displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be one critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of assessment displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be two critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max Points

Points: 15

Level II Max Points

Points: 12

Level I Max Points

Points:9

0 Points

Content Quality- Plan of Care

Presentation of plan displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Medications

· Non-pharmacological management

· Diagnostic tests

· Patient education

· Cultural considerations

· Health promotion

· Referrals

· Follow-Up

· Presentation of plan displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be one critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of plan displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.s

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max Points

Points: 15

Level II Max Points

Points: 12

Level I Max Points

Points:9

0 Points

Quality of Oral Presentation

· Presentation demonstrated thorough organization and delivery.

· All ideas were stated in a clear and logical manner.

· Presentation was on topic and relevant.

· Presentation time no longer than 5 minutes

· Presentation was organized and well spoken.

· All ideas were stated in a clear and logical manner.

· Presentation was on topic and relevant.

· Presentation >5 minutes

· Presentation needed more details or content inconclusive.

· Presentation >5 minutes

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

75

60

45

0

Minimum Total Points

61

46

1


Scroll to Top