Formal Position Of Leadership Interview Assignment



Formal Position Of Leadership Interview Assignment
Formal Position Of Leadership Interview Assignment
Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.
AMP 450v Week 1 Assignment Interview a Person in a Formal Position of Leadership Within Your Organization
Formal Position Of Leadership Interview Assignment

Interview a person in a formal position of leadership within your organization (e.g., a supervisor, a manager, a director). Begin your interview with the following questions:

What is your role as a health care team member?
How do you define professionalism and how does professional responsibility influence your work?
Do you consider yourself a steward of health care? Why or Why not?
Is it important to you that leaders exercise professional advocacy and authenticity as well as power and influence when working with colleagues? Why or why not?
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER on Formal Position Of Leadership Interview Assignment
In 500-750 words, summarize your interview and share your impressions of the leader’s responses.

Compare and contrast responses provided by your peer (in Professional Identity and Stewardship – Part I: Peer Interview assignment) with those provided by the leader. Share your impressions of their differences and similarities.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This Formal Position Of Leadership Assignment assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this Formal Position Of Leadership Assignment assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Formal Position Of Leadership Interview Assignment

GRADING RUBRIC BELOW –

1

Unsatisfactory 0-71%

0.00%

2

Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%

75.00%

3

Satisfactory 76-79%

79.00%

4

Good 80-89%

89.00%

5

Excellent 90-100%

100.00%

80.0 %Content

70.0 %Detailed Summary of Leader Interview

Summary of leader interview is not provided or is incomplete.

Summary of leader review is unclear or inconsistent with professionalism and the role of stewardship.

Summary of leader interview is clear but one of the four components of the interview is lacking.

Summary of leader interview is provided with detailed explanation of each component of professionalism, stewardship, advocacy and authenticity.

Comprehensive summary of leader interview is provided with detailed explanations of each component of professional identity and a thoughtful discussion of the interviewer’s perceptions of the interview experience.

10.0 %Compares and contrasts the peer responses, from Professional Identify and Stewardship-Part 1, with those provided by the leader. Shares impression of differences and similarities.

No comparison and contrast of peer responses with those provided by the leader are provided.

Comparison and contrast of peer responses with those provided by the leader and student’s impression of those differences and similarities are not adequately addressed.

Comparison and contrast of peer responses with those provided by the leader and student’s impression of those differences and similarities meet the basic expectations of the assignment as indicated by the assignment instructions.

Comparison and contrast of peer responses with those provided by the leader and student’s impression of those differences and similarities demonstrate a clear understanding of roles, professionalism, stewardship, and advocacy as it applies to leadership.

Comparison and contrast of peer responses with those provided by the leader and student’s impression of those differences and similarities demonstrate a clear understanding of roles, professionalism, stewardship, and advocacy as it applies to leadership, while demonstrating higher level thinking as indicated by evidence of reflective thought.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

100 %Total Weightage

AMP 450v Week 1 Assignment Professional Identity and Stewardship

Professional Identity and Stewardship – Part I: Peer Interview

Interview a fellow peer in your class who works in a different health
discipline than you. Begin your interview with the following
questions:

What is your role as a health care team member?

How do you define professionalism and how does professional
responsibility influence your work?

Do you consider leaders in your organization stewards of health care?
Why or Why not?

Is it important to you that leaders exercise professional advocacy and
authenticity as well as power and influence when working with
colleagues? Why or why not?
In 500-750 words, summarize your interview and share your
impressions of your peer’s responses.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract
is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the
rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the
assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can
be submitted to Turnitin.

===============================================

AMP 450v Week 1 DQ 1

Power, influence, advocacy, and authenticity are all functions of
leadership. View the video: ―Morale and Discipline: The Mind of a
Leader‖ at:

Discuss how strong leaders apply power, influence, advocacy, and
authenticity to motivate those they lead.
===============================================

AMP 450v Week 1 DQ 2

One model of leadership being adopted by many organizations,
disciplines, and vocations is servant leadership. Describe this model.
Identify two reasons why these groups are adopting this model.
===============================================

AMP 450V Week 2 Assignment Developing a
Shared Vision

Developing a Shared Vision

Choose two issues or challenges that the leaders of today’s health care
organizations face. Select from among the following topics:

Staff Shortage (Physicians, Nurses, Allied Health Providers, Ancillary
Services)
Reorganization in Response to Merger or Consolidation of Services

Layoffs as a Result of Declining Revenues

Influx of Registry, Part-Time, and Temporary Contract Staff

Poor Performance Outcomes Leading to a Reduction in Medicare
Reimbursement Dollars

Poor Job Satisfaction Rates Resulting in Turnover

You are the manager of an ancillary service department at a large,
500+ bed hospital. Develop a proposal (750-1,200 words) that is
directed toward your staff, in which you address the following:

Inform the staff of the two issues (from the topics provided) your
organization is facing.

Describe the impact of these issues on your department.

Describe how improved communication, collaboration, and teamwork
can improve conditions in your department.

Identify at least two examples from the required or recommended
readings of techniques found to foster inclusion and improve
communication and collaboration.

A minimum of three academic references from credible sources are
required for this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract
is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the
rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the
assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can
be submitted to Turnitin.

===============================================

AMP 450V Week 2 DQ 1

In the assigned article, ―Core Principles & Values of Effective Team-
Based Health
Care‖(http://www.iom.edu/Global/Perspectives/2012/TeamBasedCare
.aspx) the authors state that ―the incorporation of multiple
perspectives in health care offers the benefit of diverse knowledge
and experience; however, in practice, shared responsibility without
high-quality teamwork can be fraught with peril.‖ Describe the perils

that the authors say lead to uncoordinated care and unnecessary waste
and cost. How do communication and interdisciplinary collaboration
prevent adverse events?
===============================================

AMP 450V Week 2 DQ 2

Consider your current work environment and your role as a member
of the health care team. What can you do to encourage collaboration
and demonstrate stewardship?
===============================================

AMP 450V Week 3 Assignment Collaborative
Decision Making Through Shared Governance

Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance

Attend a committee meeting in your health care organization. If you
are not currently employed in a health care setting, you may elect to
attend a committee meeting at another company, a community center,
a local school, local chamber of commerce or other professional
organization.

Observe the interactions between committee members and the process
used by the committee to arrive at decisions.

In 500-750 words, describe the function of the committee and the
roles of those in attendance. Describe your observations of the
interactions between members of the committee and determine
whether the process used to arrive at decisions is a form of shared
governance.

A minimum of two academic references from credible sources are
required for this assignment.

Submit the completed ―Collaborative Committee Meeting
Verification Form‖ with the assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract
is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the
rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the
assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can
be submitted to Turnitin.

===============================================

AMP 450V Week 3 DQ 1

Find an organization related to your health care discipline and identify
the mission and vision statement. Based on your experiences as a
member of the health care team, explain how the values of the
organization are or are not reflected in these statements.
===============================================

AMP 450V Week 3 DQ 2

Professional mentorship has been identified as an important
component of professional engagement, professional growth, and
advancement. Consider your own professional journey. Has a mentor
shaped your professional advancement? Share a mentor experience
from your personal or professional life. What benefits did the
experience offer you? How might you mentor other providers seeking
to advance in your discipline?
===============================================

AMP 450V Week 4 Assignment Critical
Decision Making for Providers

Critical Decision Making for Providers

View the scenario called ―Critical Decision Making for Providers‖
foud in the Allied Health Community media
(http://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt307v/allied-health-community/allied-
health-community-v1.1.html)
In a 750-1,200 word paper, describe the scenario involving Mike, the
lab technician, and answer the following questions:

What were the consequences of a failure to report?

What impact did his decision have on patient safety, on the risk for
litigation, on the organization’s quality metrics, and on the workload
of other hospital departments?
As Mike’s manager, what will you do to address the issue with him
and ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes?

A minimum of three academic references from credible sources are
required for this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract
is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the
rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the

rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the
assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can
be submitted to Turnitin.

===============================================

AMP 450V Week 4 DQ 1

The author of the assigned article, ―Shattuck Lecture: A Successful
and Sustainable
Health System — How to Get There from Here‖

(https://library.gcu.edu:2443/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libr
ary.gcu.edu:
2048/docview/929159711?accountid=7374) maintains that a
sustainable health system has three key attributes. What are these
three key attributes and what recommendations are offered to ensure
efficiency, sustainability, and optimal functioning?

===============================================

AMP 450V Week 4 DQ 2

How can a crisis situation make collaboration and trust stronger in a
group? Why does this happen? How can staff development improve
rapport among colleagues and build trust across departments
===============================================

AMP 450V Week 5 Assignment Connected
Health and the Digital Age of Medicine

Connected Health and the Digital Age of Medicine
Explore the technology systems offered by Nanthealth, a provider of
―telehealth‖ and health management services.

Prepare a brief (8-10 slides) PowerPoint presentation in which you do
the following:
Identify at least two technology innovations to connect patients,
providers, and insurers across the care continuum.

Describe how the technologies work to provide patients and providers
with data necessary for health care decision making.

Discuss how the real-time data encourages outcome-focused
planning.

Predict what impact the technology will have on future health care
delivery. Provide rationale and examples.

Presentations must include speakers’ notes on each slide, as well as
references for the presentation. A minimum of three academic
references from credible sources are required for this assignment. The
slide count (8-10 slides) does not include the introduction and
References slide(s).

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract
is not required.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless
otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the
Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be
submitted to Turnitin.

===============================================

AMP 450V Week 5 DQ 1

The authors of the assigned article, ―A Patient-Driven Adaptive
Prediction Technique to Improve Personalized Risk Estimation for
Clinical Decision Support
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3392846/) have
found that using patient-driven, adaptive technologies to guide
clinical decision making are influencing the quality of patient care.
How might these technologies minimize risk, promote health, and
encourage patient engagement in their own care?
===============================================

AMP 450V Week 5 DQ 2

Envision what the health care system of 2030 might look like?
Describe at least two technological advancements that would be
available to patients. How would technology help providers make
health care decisions? How would patients and families interact with
providers from their homes or in their communities? What would
health care systems be able to do ―in real time?‖


Scroll to Top